![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjdeVKH-iIQ7C4mnxWUvZ7pvuv3qfzkcX_0fERldunKEXk0JuJEr0Si8OWtglKRJd0ZPAJSUBp-Hw7QxfENFs28gmkL1EECobpOVqHt48WNUzUvEqo_kXU5M1aKMvhxm1ZXl976yq3176c/s640/2c501fddd7eaf07a244601044162ee59.jpg)
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhv-33w-KjgPvGvxCFscyWXyS5MsS_BPVEk4WPovnBE7cmE7WzMQfyc6_UN7qj_cd6UvaIGod2mcbdljIguPg7gOTWCPAQZOFdqAcDQJl8btSx7MxW9auFn9Tc4ea-B4hkXCsqfXIpLlN0/s640/6a1aa0d779258d2a5421af0f7fe04a4f.jpg)
post response: +4
original post: here
1. Damn, if it wasn't for the lolita concept it would've been pretty
2. The picture doesn't give off the lolita vibe so it's pretty
>Right it looks just like a normal pictorial
3. You can debate on the first picture
4. It has a different aura than Rotta's usual photos, it's pretty!
5. It doesn't have Rotta's vibe at all?
6. I don't think it's lolita
7. Even though it has the color scheme of Rotta's picture, this is not lolita, the editor was also a different person... Rotta shot a lot of non-lolita pictures before too
8. It's not only Rotta, he worked with another photographer named Davin!
9. It doesn't give the vibe of any of Rotta's works
0 comments:
Post a Comment