[enter-talk] SM VS CUBE 2002 LINE

2002 visuals





SM- NCT Jisung
February 5th 2002
height: 178







Cube - Produce 101 Seonho
January 28th 2002
height: 179.1

vote up SM
vote down Cube

post response:

[+305][-657]

original post: here

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 00:22 신고하기

But Jisung isn't even considered a visual in NCTㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ (although he's handsome) he's the center and he's in charge of dancing. Haven't you seen him dance on Mickey mouse club when he was in elementary school 1st year? He's freaking good. The 2 of them don't even occupy the same position, there's no point in comparing;;

175

9

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 03:55 신고하기

Even if Cube wins in terms of visuals, SM wins in terms of talent. Yoo Seonho even got F-ranked on Produce, he only knows the basics. And he's only been practicing for 6 months, when Jisung trained for 4~5 years ?? Anyways, have you guys never seen Jisung dance? You'd know just how good he is. He even teaches dance to his peers and he only has 4 seconds in the title song, but he's always in the center because he's f*cking good at dancing. 

157

22

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 00:22 신고하기

If you want someone who's the closest to a standard flower boy, it's Cube. But SM has more of a stan attractor vibe?

114

10

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 03:55 신고하기

Face Cube, skills SM. Jisung is f*cking good

66

4

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 00:20 신고하기

Yoo Seonho doesn't even feel like a 16 years old, he looks like an adult. Whereas jisung looks like a middle schooler and he's cute. So objectively, if you pick the handsome one, it'll be Seonho obviouslyㅋ

57

3

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 00:33 신고하기

How did Jisung grow so tall.....He was only 170 last year ㅠㅠ

55

0

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 03:54 신고하기

But Jisung destroys his when it comes to skills

47

13

ㅇㅇ |2017.08.20 00:31 신고하기

NCT are all handsome, but Jisung is not in charge of the visuals. Jisung is of course handsome, but Jeno, Jaemin and Mark come to mind when I think of visuals

47

0